[restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” responsive=”false”]
[restab title=”Urban Housing Planning and Development Policy” active=”active”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Urban Housing Planning and Development Policy |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17–6-1-SP1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Kebijakan Pengembangan Perumahan Kota |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| Lecturer | Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D |
| Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of urban housing planning and development and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing urban housing planning implementation | |
| Able to formulate issues in urban housing | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of urban housing planning and development | |
| Content | The students will do a simulation regarding the policies in urban housing development planning. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Guide of Planning Studio | |
| Resume of Regional/Urban and urban housing profile | |
| problem formulation | |
| Analysis of relation between problems | |
| Objective formulation | |
| Scenario development | |
| Planning policies | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Sustainable Neighborhood Planning for the Region: Neighborhood Scale |
| Ford, Jonathan (2009). Grids, Patterns, & Sustainable Infrastructure : New Partners for Smart Growth | |
| LaGro, J, 2008, Site Analysis: A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land Planning and Site Design | |
| Payne, G & Majale, M. 2004. The Urban Housing Manual | |
| Committee on Review of Geographic Information Systems Research and Applications, 2003, GIS for Housing and Urban Development | |
| Hasselaar, E. 2006. Health Performance of Housing: Indicatiors and Tools | |
| Jenkins, P, Smith H & Wang YP. 2007. Planning and Housing in the Rapidly Urbanising World | |
| Pedoman Umum Rumah Sederhana Sehat | |
| Silas, Johan (1989). Perjalanan Panjang Perumahan Indonesia, dalam dan sekitar abad XX |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Development”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Urban Development |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-SK1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Pengembangan Kota |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| Lecturer | Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| Dr. Eng. Muhammad Sani Roychansyah, S.T., M.Eng. | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minumum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of urban planning and
development and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing urban planning and development
implementation |
|
| Able to formulate issues in urban development | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of urban planning and development | |
| Content | The students will do planning in an urban scale. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. |
| O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Regional Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Regional Planning and Development |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-SW1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Pengembangan Wilayah |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| Lecturer | Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP, Ph.D |
| Ratna Eka Suminar, ST., M.Sc. | |
| Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP. | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of regional planning and development and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing regional planning and development implementation | |
| Able to formulate issues of regional development | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of regional planning and development | |
| Content | The students will do planning in a regional context. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Bendavid-Val, A. (1991). Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners. London: Preager |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Heritage Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Urban Heritage Planning and Development |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-SH1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Perencanaan Pengembangan Kota Kaya Cagar Budaya |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| Lecturer | Ir. Didik Kristiadi, MLA, M.Arch.UD |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of urban heritage planning and development and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing urban heritage planning and development implementation | |
| Able to formulate issues in urban heritage development | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of urban heritage planning and development | |
| Content | The students will do planning from a heritage perspective. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. |
| O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small | |
| Nuryanti, W. (2009). The Role of Heritage Tourism in Community Planning and Development. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban or Regional Infrastructure Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Urban or Regional Infrastructure Planning and Development |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-SI1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Perencanaan & Pengelolaan Infrastruktur (Wilayah atau Kota) |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minumum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of infrastructure planning and development and its various components in urban/regional context |
| Able to evaluate existing infrastructure planning and development implementation in urban/regional context | |
| Able to formulate infrastructure issues in urban/regional context | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of infrastructure planning and development in urban/regional context | |
| Content | The students will do an urban or regional infrastructure planning. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. |
| O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Commercial Housing Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Commercial Housing Planning and Development |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-SR1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Perencanaan Pengembangan Perumahan Komersial |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of commercial housing planning and development and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing commercial housing development needs | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of commercial housing planning and development | |
| Content | The students will do planning of commercial housing area. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. |
| O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Environmental Planning”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Urban Environmental Planning |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-SL1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Perencanaan Lingkungan Perkotaan |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D. |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of urban environmental planning and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing urban environmental management plan | |
| Able to formulate urban environmental issues | |
| Able to design urban environmental management plans/programs | |
| Content | The students will do planning from an environmental perspective. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. |
| O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Westman, Walter E. Ecology, Impact assessment, and Environmental Planning. | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Bartone, Carl. Toward environmental strategies for cities |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Creative or Resilient City Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 1 Creative or Resilient City Planning and Development |
| Module level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-1-ST1 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 1: Pengembangan Kota Kreatif atau Kota Tangguh |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 1 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Subject |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes |
| Recommended prerequisites | – |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of creative or resilient city planning and development and its various components |
| Able to evaluate existing creative or resilient city planning and development implementation | |
| Able to formulate issues in creative or resilient city development | |
| Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of creative or resilient city planning and development | |
| Content | The students will do planning using the resilient or creative city concept. The topics discussed in this subject are: |
| Profile, objectives, and problem formulation | |
| Spatial structure and pattern identification | |
| Project formulation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. |
| O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis | |
| Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB | |
| Greiving, Stefan. Spatial planning and resilience following disasters: International and comparative perspective. |
.[/restab][/restabs]