[restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” responsive=”false”]
[restab title=”Urban Housing Revitalization” active=”active”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Urban Housing Revitalization |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SP2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Peremajaan Permukiman Kota |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D |
| Lecturer | Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D |
| Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of urban housing revitalization and its various components |
| Able to formulate urban renewal investment plan and concept | |
| Able to design an urban revitalization project including its feasibility analysis | |
| Content | The students will do planning specifically on the revitalization of urban housing. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Neighborhood Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Urban Neighborhood Planning and Development |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SK2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Perkotaan |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of urban neighborhood planning and its various components |
| Able to formulate urban neighborhood investment plan and concept | |
| Able to design an urban neighborhood project including its feasibility analysis | |
| Content | The students will do planning regarding an urban neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems | |
| Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Rural Neighborhood Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Rural Neighborhood Planning and Development |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SW2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Perkotaan |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of rural neighborhood planning and its various components |
| Able to formulate rural neighborhood planning issues | |
| Able to design a long-term rural neighborhood plan/program | |
| Content | The students will do planning regarding a rural neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems | |
| Dias, Hiran D. Manual for training in rural development planning | |
| Davidson, J. ; Wibberley, Gerald. Planning and the rural environment | |
| Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Heritage Neighborhood Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Heritage Neighborhood Planning and Development |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SH2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Cagar Budaya |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of heritage neighborhood planning and its various components |
| Able to formulate heritage neighborhood investment plan and concept | |
| Able to design a heritage neighborhood plan/program that are integrated with the economic and community development | |
| Content | The students will do planning in a heritage neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Nuryanti, W. (2009). The Role of Heritage Tourism in Community Planning and Development. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf | |
| Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Infrastructure Planning and Development”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Infrastructure Planning and Development |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SI2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Infrastruktur |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D |
| Lecturer | Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D |
| Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of infrastructure management and its various components |
| Able to formulate infrastructure management issues | |
| Able to design an infrastructure management plan/project based on its sectors | |
| Content | The students will do planning from an infrastructure perspective. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation | |
| Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems | |
| Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. | |
| Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Property Planning and Development (Non-Residential)”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Property Planning and Development (Non-Residential) |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SR2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan Pengembangan Properti non-Perumahan |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of non-residential property planning and its various components |
| Able to formulate non-residential property investment plan and concept | |
| Able to design an non-residential property project including its feasibility analysis | |
| Content | The students will do planning of non-residential property. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Webster, Chris. Property rights, planning and markets managing spontaneous cities | |
| Stevenson, Glenn G.. Common property economics a general theory and land use applications |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Landscape Planning”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Landscape Planning (Urban, or Rural) |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-SL2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan Lansekap (Perkotaan atau Pedesaan) |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of landscape planning and its various components |
| Able to determine landscape potential in various context | |
| Able to create a sustainable landscape design/program | |
| Content | The students will do a landscape planning of an urban or rural area. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Gonzalez, Alonso ; Eugenio, Martinez-Falero (eds). Quantitative techniques in landscape planning | |
| Steiner, Frederick. The living landscape : an ecological approach to landscape planning | |
| Bookout, Lloyd W. Value by design landscape, site planning and amenities | |
| Reid, Grant W. From concept to form in landscape design |
.[/restab]
[restab title=”Smart City Infrastructure”]
| Module name | Studio 2 Smart City Infrastructure |
| Modul level, if applicable | Master |
| Code, if applicable | TKP17-6-2-ST2 |
| Subtitle, if applicable | Studio Perencanaan 2: Infrastruktur Kota Cerdas |
| Courses, if applicable | – |
| Semester(s) in which the module is taught | 2 |
| Person responsible for the module | |
| Lecturer | |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Relation to curriculum | Compulsory Course |
| Type of teaching, contract hours | Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL |
| Workload | 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. |
| Credit points | 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS |
| Requirements according to the examination regulations | Presentation/Display and Written final examination |
| Recommended prerequisites | Studio 1 |
| Module objectives/intended learning outcomes | Able to comprehend the principles of smart city infrastructure and its various components |
| Able to formulate smart city infrastructure investment planning issues | |
| Able to design a smart city infrastructure plan/program that are integrated with the economic and community development | |
| Content | The students will do planning and incorporating the smart city infrastructure. The topics in this subject are: |
| Strategic Program Analysis | |
| Spatial and Physical Design | |
| Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis | |
| Institutional Design for Program Implementation | |
| Study and examination requirements and forms of examination | Progress and final display presentation |
| Media employed | LCD, Computer |
| Reading list | Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission |
| Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) | |
| Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. | |
| Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 | |
| Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. | |
| Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. | |
| Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. | |
| Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar | |
| Bouskela et al., 2016, The Road toward Smart Cities: Migrating from Traditional City Management to the Smart City, IDB. | |
| Dameri, R.P. & A. Cocchia. (2013) Smart City and Digital City: Twenty Years of Terminology Evolution. The Proceeding of itAIS 2013 Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS: Empowering society through digital innovations, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan (Italy), December 14th, 2013 | |
| Nam, Taewoo & Theresa A. Pardo. (2011) Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, June 12-15, 2011, College Park, MD, USA | |
| Marcin Baron, 2012, “Do We Need Smart Cities for Resilience”, Journal of Economics and Management, Vol. 10, University of Economics, Katowice. |
.[/restab][/restabs]