• UGM Portal
  • Academic Portal
  • Webmail
  • Training programme
  • Palawa
  • English
    • English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
Universitas Gadjah Mada Master in Urban and Regional Planning
Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • About
    • Profile
      • Quality Assurance
    • Community
      • Academic Staff
      • Suppoting Staff
      • Student
      • Alumni
  • Program
    • Master Program
      • Admission
      • PEO and PLO
      • Curriculum & Syllabus
      • Learning Culture
    • Double Degree Program
      • Double Degree Program – University of Groningen
      • Kobe University
    • Training Program
  • International
    • List of Partners
    • Arrival
  • Activity
    • Academic Calendar
    • Research Agenda
    • Community Service
    • Dissemination
      • Research Publication
      • Proceeding and Working Paper
      • Journal
      • Thesis
    • Academic Resources
  • Student Life
    • Study in Yogyakarta
      • Student Life
    • Campus Life
      • Facilities
      • SIMASTER UGM
      • Cloud Printing
      • UGM IT Services
      • UGM Library
  • LINK
    • Download
    • Training Program MURP
    • Academic UGM
    • Library UGM
    • OIA UGM
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • OIA Faculty of Engineering
    • Library Faculty of Engineering
    • Undergraduate Program in Urban and Regional Planning
    • Department of Architecture and Planning
    • Master Program in Architecture
    • Doctoral Program in Architecture
    • PSPPR UGM
  • Home
  • Post by
  • page. 2
Post by :

varrel.v

Research Methodology

Course Term 2 Thursday, 15 August 2019

Module name Research Methodology
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-202
Subtitle, if applicable Metodologi Penelitian
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Prof. Dr. Ir. Achmad Djunaedi, MUP
Lecturer Prof. Dr. Ir. Achmad Djunaedi, MUP
Prof. Ir. Sudaryono, MEng., Ph.D
Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc. Ph.D.
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to assess the suitable approach or model to be used in a research in planning knowledge domain
Able to demonstrate various approaches/paradigms for research work in the urban and regional planning domain
Able to formulate scientific work proficiently
Content This course will provide the students the ability to understand and capable to do research in the urban and regional planning context. Students will learn various research method and how to write a better thesis.

The subject topics are:

Planning domain research and Philosophy of science
Research paradigm
Various research methods
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, Pustaka Pelajar.

 

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage publications, inc
Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. John Wiley & Sons.
Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. In Alternative Paradigms Conference, Mar, 1989, Indiana U, School of Education, San Francisco, CA, US. Sage Publications, Inc
Evans, D., Gruba, P., & Zobel, J. (2011). How to write a better thesis. Melbourne Univ. Publishing
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods.

Planning Studio 2

Course Term 2 Thursday, 15 August 2019

[restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” responsive=”false”]
[restab title=”Urban Housing Revitalization” active=”active”]

Module name Studio 2 Urban Housing Revitalization
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SP2
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Peremajaan Permukiman Kota
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Lecturer Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination
Recommended prerequisites Studio 1
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban housing revitalization and its various components
Able to formulate urban renewal investment plan and concept
Able to design an urban revitalization project including its feasibility analysis
Content The students will do planning specifically on the revitalization of urban housing. The topics in this subject are:
Strategic Program Analysis
Spatial and Physical Design
Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis
Institutional Design for Program Implementation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission
Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970)
Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82.
Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society.
Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Neighborhood Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 2 Urban Neighborhood Planning and Development
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SK2
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Perkotaan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Lecturer  
 
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination
Recommended prerequisites Studio 1
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban neighborhood planning and its various components
Able to formulate urban neighborhood investment plan and concept
Able to design an urban neighborhood project including its feasibility analysis
Content The students will do planning regarding an urban neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are:
Strategic Program Analysis
Spatial and Physical Design
Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis
Institutional Design for Program Implementation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission
Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970)
Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82.
Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society.
Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Rural Neighborhood Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 2 Rural Neighborhood Planning and Development
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SW2
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Perkotaan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module  
Lecturer  
 
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination
Recommended prerequisites Studio 1
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of rural neighborhood planning and its various components
Able to formulate rural neighborhood planning issues
Able to design a long-term rural neighborhood plan/program
Content The students will do planning regarding a rural neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are:
Strategic Program Analysis
Spatial and Physical Design
Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis
Institutional Design for Program Implementation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission
Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970)
Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82.
Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society.
Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Dias, Hiran D. Manual for training in rural development planning
Davidson, J. ; Wibberley, Gerald. Planning and the rural environment
Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Heritage Neighborhood Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 2 Heritage Neighborhood Planning and Development
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SH2
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Cagar Budaya
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module  
Lecturer  
 
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination
Recommended prerequisites Studio 1
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of heritage neighborhood planning and its various components
Able to formulate heritage neighborhood investment plan and concept
Able to design a heritage neighborhood plan/program that are integrated with the economic and community development
Content The students will do planning in a heritage neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are:
Strategic Program Analysis
Spatial and Physical Design
Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis
Institutional Design for Program Implementation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission
Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970)
Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82.
Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Nuryanti, W. (2009). The Role of Heritage Tourism in Community Planning and Development. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Infrastructure Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 2 Infrastructure Planning and Development
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SI2
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Infrastruktur
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Lecturer Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination
Recommended prerequisites Studio 1
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of infrastructure management and its various components
Able to formulate infrastructure management issues
Able to design an infrastructure management plan/project based on its sectors
Content The students will do planning from an infrastructure perspective. The topics in this subject are:
Strategic Program Analysis
Spatial and Physical Design
Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis
Institutional Design for Program Implementation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission
Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970)
Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82.
Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society.
Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Property Planning and Development (Non-Residential)”] read more

Planning Methods and Techniques 2

Course Term 2 Thursday, 15 August 2019

Module name Planning Methods and Techniques 2
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-201
Subtitle, if applicable Proses dan Metode Teknik Perencanaan II
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Prof. Dr. Ir. Achmad Djunaedi, MUP
Lecturer Prof. Dr. Ir. Achmad Djunaedi, MUP
Prof. Ir. Bakti Setiawan, MA., Ph.D.
Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
M. Sani Roychansyah, ST., M.Eng., D.Eng
Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Dr. Yori Herwangi, ST., MURP
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 3 SKS / 7.5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes
  1. Able to apply the principles of sectoral planning development
  2. Able to demonstrate appropriate methods of implementation of spatial use in sectoral planning development
  3. Able to determine the suitable implementation scheme of spatial use in sectoral planning
  4. Able to formulate the proposal of the investment program
Content This course equips students with more in-depth process and methods that relate to planning on 3 space scales in accordance with the theme/concentration of the sector. The subject topics are:

  1. Identification and Spatial Analysis
  2. Spatial and Behavioural Involvement
  3. Spatial Development
  4. Spatial Management
  5. Spatial Financing
  6. Monitoring and Evaluation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination written mid-term and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Krueckeberg, Donald A. (1974). Urban Planning Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Muta’ali, Lutfi. (2012). Daya Dukung Lingkungan untuk Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Geografi
Aziz, I.J. (1994). Ilmu Ekonomi Regional dan beberapa Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Bendavid-Val, A. (1991). Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners. London: Preager.
Blakey, E.J. (1994). Planning Local Economic Development. London: SAGE.
Hoover, E.M, dan Giarratani, F. (1971). An Introduction to Regional Economics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
John, Conink. (2016) Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation in Development. Los Angeles: Sage Production

Development Management Based

Course Term 2 Thursday, 15 August 2019

[restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” responsive=”false”]
[restab title=”Housing Development Policy and Management” active=”active”]

Module name Housing Development Policy and Management
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP 17-6-2-MP
Subtitle, if applicable Kebijakan dan Manajemen Pembangunan Perumahan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Lecturer Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto ST., MSc., Ph.D.
Retno Widodo Dwi Pramono, ST., MSc., Ph.D.
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to evaluate principle of development management in the planning cycle especially in an housing context
Able to compare between theories and practices of housing management  in local and global context
Able to demonstrate suitable instrument for housing management
Content This course will provide policy, program, and implementation in the context of housing management.

The subject topics are:

Spatial planning and implementation
Theory and organizational dynamics
Political aspect in planning and implementation
Institutional aspect and planning law
Program implementation and public policy
Housing management
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Briyant, C., Hagul, P., Simatupang, R. L., & White, L. G. (1987). Manajemen pembangunan: untuk negara berkembang. LP3ES.
Cheema, G. S., & Ward, S. E. (Eds.). (1993). Urban management: Policies and innovations in developing countries. Praeger Publishers.
Masser, I. (1995). Managing Fast Growing Cities: New Approaches to Urban Planning and Management in the Developing World.
Goggin, M. L. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Scott Foresman & Co.
Levy, J. M. (1991). Contemporary urban planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman.
Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
DW, N. R., Steinberg, F., & Van der Hoff, R. (1993). Manajemen Pembangunan Prasarana Perkotaan. LP3ES.
Hoch, C., Dalton, L. C., So, F. S., & ICMA Training Institute. (2000). The practice of local government planning. Washington, DC: Published for the ICMA Training Institute by the International City/County Management Association.
Suselo, H., Taylor, J. L., & Wegelin, E. A. (Eds.). (1995). Indonesia’s urban infrastructure development experience: critical lessons of good practice. In cooperation with the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (HABITAT).

 

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Management”]

Module name Urban Management
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP 17-6-2-MK
Subtitle, if applicable Manajemen Perkotaan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Lecturer Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Prof. Ir. Bakti Setiawan, MA., Ph.D.
Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to evaluate principle of development management in the planning cycle especially in an urban context
Able to compare between theories and practices of urban management  in local and global context
Able to demonstrate suitable instrument for urban management
Content This course will provide policy, program, and implementation in the context of urban management.

The subject topics are:

Spatial planning and implementation
Theory and organizational dynamics
Political aspect in planning and implementation
Institutional aspect and planning law
Program implementation and public policy
Urban management
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Briyant, C., Hagul, P., Simatupang, R. L., & White, L. G. (1987). Manajemen pembangunan: untuk negara berkembang. LP3ES.
Cheema, G. S., & Ward, S. E. (Eds.). (1993). Urban management: Policies and innovations in developing countries. Praeger Publishers.
Masser, I. (1995). Managing Fast Growing Cities: New Approaches to Urban Planning and Management in the Developing World.
Goggin, M. L. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Scott Foresman & Co.
Levy, J. M. (1991). Contemporary urban planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman.
Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
DW, N. R., Steinberg, F., & Van der Hoff, R. (1993). Manajemen Pembangunan Prasarana Perkotaan. LP3ES.
Hoch, C., Dalton, L. C., So, F. S., & ICMA Training Institute. (2000). The practice of local government planning. Washington, DC: Published for the ICMA Training Institute by the International City/County Management Association.

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Inter-regional Cooperation Management”]

Module name Inter-regional Cooperation Management
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP 17-6-2-MW
Subtitle, if applicable Manajemen Kerjasama Antar Wilayah
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Lecturer Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to evaluate principle of development management in the planning cycle especially in an regional cooperation context
Able to compare between theories and practices of regional cooperation management  in local and global context
Able to demonstrate suitable instrument for urban management
Content This course will provide policy, program, and implementation in the context of regional cooperation management.

The subject topics are:

Spatial planning and implementation
Theory and organizational dynamics
Political aspect in planning and implementation
Institutional aspect and planning law
Program implementation and public policy
Inter-regional cooperation management
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Briyant, C., Hagul, P., Simatupang, R. L., & White, L. G. (1987). Manajemen pembangunan: untuk negara berkembang. LP3ES.
Cheema, G. S., & Ward, S. E. (Eds.). (1993). Urban management: Policies and innovations in developing countries. Praeger Publishers.
Masser, I. (1995). Managing Fast Growing Cities: New Approaches to Urban Planning and Management in the Developing World.
Goggin, M. L. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Scott Foresman & Co.
Levy, J. M. (1991). Contemporary urban planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman.
Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
DW, N. R., Steinberg, F., & Van der Hoff, R. (1993). Manajemen Pembangunan Prasarana Perkotaan. LP3ES.
Hoch, C., Dalton, L. C., So, F. S., & ICMA Training Institute. (2000). The practice of local government planning. Washington, DC: Published for the ICMA Training Institute by the International City/County Management Association.
Suselo, H., Taylor, J. L., & Wegelin, E. A. (Eds.). (1995). Indonesia’s urban infrastructure development experience: critical lessons of good practice. In cooperation with the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (HABITAT).

 

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Infrastructure Management”]

Module name Infrastructure Management
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP 17-6-2-MI
Subtitle, if applicable Manajemen Infrastuktur
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Lecturer Ir. Leksono P Subanu, MURP., PhD
Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
Retno Widodo Dwi Pramono, ST., MSc., Ph.D.
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to evaluate principle of development management in the planning cycle especially in an infrastructure context
Able to compare between theories and practices of infrastructure management  in local and global context
Able to demonstrate suitable instrument for infrastructure management
Content This course will provide policy, program, and implementation in the context of infrastructure management.

The subject topics are:

Spatial planning and implementation
Theory and organizational dynamics
Political aspect in planning and implementation
Institutional aspect and planning law
Program implementation and public policy
Infrastructure management
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Briyant, C., Hagul, P., Simatupang, R. L., & White, L. G. (1987). Manajemen pembangunan: untuk negara berkembang. LP3ES.
Cheema, G. S., & Ward, S. E. (Eds.). (1993). Urban management: Policies and innovations in developing countries. Praeger Publishers.
Masser, I. (1995). Managing Fast Growing Cities: New Approaches to Urban Planning and Management in the Developing World.
Goggin, M. L. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Scott Foresman & Co.
Levy, J. M. (1991). Contemporary urban planning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman.
Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
DW, N. R., Steinberg, F., & Van der Hoff, R. (1993). Manajemen Pembangunan Prasarana Perkotaan. LP3ES.
Hoch, C., Dalton, L. C., So, F. S., & ICMA Training Institute. (2000). The practice of local government planning. Washington, DC: Published for the ICMA Training Institute by the International City/County Management Association.

.[/restab][/restabs]

Economics

Course Term 2 Thursday, 15 August 2019

[restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” responsive=”false”]
[restab title=”Land and Housing Economics” active=”active”]

Module name Land and Housing Economics
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-EP
Subtitle, if applicable Ekonomi Lahan dan Perumahan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D.
Lecturer Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D.
Deva Fosterharoldas F Swasto
Retno Widodo Dwi P, ST. MSc. Ph.D
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 7.5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend basic theories of land and housing economics
Able to critique the conceptions of land and housing economics structure and its relation to development using spatial perspective
Able to formulate an economic/financing scheme to solve land and housing economics problems
Content This course provides knowledge and skills in spatial economics, specifically in land and housing economics. It will provide a spatial perspective in each economics analysis and examine how the process of interaction between environment spatial with economic activity

The subject topics are:

Basic economic theory (Macroeconomic and Microeconomics)
Poverty and regional disparity
Land and Housing economics; Land economics, housing economics, informal sector.
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm, economics paper and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Grant, Ruth W. 2015. Rethinking the Ethics of Incentives. Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (3): 354-372.
Parkin, Michael. 2016. Opportunity Cost: A reexamination. The Journal of Economic Education 47 (1): 12-22
Watts, Brad R. 2008.  Understanding Opportunity Cost and the Economist’s View. A response to “the Economist’s Fallacy.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluations 5. (10):89-92.
Gandjour, Afschim. 2008. Is It Rational to Pursue Utilitarianism? Ethica; Perspective Journal of the European Ethics Networks 14(2):139-158
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal 39 (153): 41-57
McCann, Philip. 1993. The Logistics-Cost Location-Production Problem. Journal of Regional Science 33 (4): 503-516
Mulligan, Gordon F. 1984. Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A review of the
literature. International Regional Science Review 9 (1): 1-42
Porter, Michael E. 1998. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review November-December: 77-90
Berry, Brian J.L. & Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam. 2011. The City Size Distribution Debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas. Cities 29 (S1): S17-S23
Eaton, B. Curtis & Lipsey Richard G. 1982. An Economic Theory of Central Places. The Economic Journal 92 (365): 56-72
Giesen, Kristian & Sudekun, Jens. 2011. Zipf’s Law for Cities in the Regions and the Country. Journal of Economic Geography 11: 667-686
Kraus, Marvin. 2006. Monocentric Cities. Dalam Arnott, Richard J. & McMillen, Daniel P. eds. 2006. A Companion to Urban Economics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 96-108.
O’Kelly, Morton & Bryan, Deborah. 1996. Agricultural Location Theory: Von Thunen’s contribution to economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 20 (4): 457-475
Wagner, William B. 1974. An Empirical Test of Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation. Growth and Change 5 (3): 30-35
Dawkins, Casey J. 2003. Regional Development Theory: Conceptual foundations, classic works, and recent developments. Journal of Planning Literature 18 (2): 131-172.
Martin, Ron & Sunley, Peter. 2011. Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the life cycle model? Regional Studies 45 (10): 1299-1318
Solow, Robert M. 1994. Perspectives on Growth Theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 45-54
Asra, Abuzar. 2000. Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 5 (1-2): 91-111
Dartanto, Teguh & Nurkholis. 2013. The Determinants of Poverty Dynamics in Indonesia: evidence from panel data. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 49 (1): 6184
Mogstad, Magne, Langorgen, Audun & Aaberge, Rolf. 2007. Region-Specific versus Country-Specific Poverty Lines in Analysis of Poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality 5 (1): 115-122
Savitch, H.V. 2002. What Is New About Globalisation and What Does It Portend for Cities? International Social Science Journal 54: 179-189
Pain, Kathy. The Strategic Planning Protagonist: Unveiling the global mega-city region. dalam Knowles, Richard D. & Rozenblat, Celine. eds. 2016. Sir Peter Hall: Pioneer in Regional Planning, Transport, and Urban Geography. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice Vol. 52
Barca, Fabrizio, McCann, Philip & Rodriguez-Pose, Andres. 2012. The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134-152
Marcuse, Peter. 1985. Gentrification, Abandonment, and Displacement: Connections, causes and policy responses in New York City. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 28 (1): 195-240
Blankart, Charles B. & Koester, Gerrit B. Political Economics versus Public Choice: Two views of political economy in competition
Stark, Andrew. 2002. What Is the New Public Management? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (1): 137-151
McCann, Philip. Modern Urban and Regional Economics, 2 editions. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Economics”]

Module name Urban Economics
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-EK
Subtitle, if applicable Ekonomi Kota
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D.
Lecturer Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D.
Prof. Ir. Bakti Setiawan, MA., Ph.D.
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 7.5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend basic theories of urban economics
Able to critique the conceptions of an urban economic structure and its relation to development using spatial perspective
Able to formulate an economic/financing scheme to solve urban economic problems
Content This course provides knowledge and skills in spatial economics, specifically in urban economics. It will provide a spatial perspective in each economics analysis and examine how the process of interaction between environment spatial with economic activity

The subject topics are:

Basic economic theory (Macroeconomic and Microeconomics)
Poverty and regional disparity
Land Use and Transportation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm, economics paper and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Grant, Ruth W. 2015. Rethinking the Ethics of Incentives. Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (3): 354-372.
Parkin, Michael. 2016. Opportunity Cost: A reexamination. The Journal of Economic Education 47 (1): 12-22
Watts, Brad R. 2008.  Understanding Opportunity Cost and the Economist’s View. A response to “the Economist’s Fallacy.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluations 5. (10):89-92.
Gandjour, Afschim. 2008. Is It Rational to Pursue Utilitarianism? Ethica; Perspective Journal of the European Ethics Networks 14(2):139-158
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal 39 (153): 41-57
McCann, Philip. 1993. The Logistics-Cost Location-Production Problem. Journal of Regional Science 33 (4): 503-516
Mulligan, Gordon F. 1984. Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A review of the
literature. International Regional Science Review 9 (1): 1-42
Porter, Michael E. 1998. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review November-December: 77-90
Berry, Brian J.L. & Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam. 2011. The City Size Distribution Debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas. Cities 29 (S1): S17-S23
Eaton, B. Curtis & Lipsey Richard G. 1982. An Economic Theory of Central Places. The Economic Journal 92 (365): 56-72
Giesen, Kristian & Sudekun, Jens. 2011. Zipf’s Law for Cities in the Regions and the Country. Journal of Economic Geography 11: 667-686
Kraus, Marvin. 2006. Monocentric Cities. Dalam Arnott, Richard J. & McMillen, Daniel P. eds. 2006. A Companion to Urban Economics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 96-108.
O’Kelly, Morton & Bryan, Deborah. 1996. Agricultural Location Theory: Von Thunen’s contribution to economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 20 (4): 457-475
Wagner, William B. 1974. An Empirical Test of Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation. Growth and Change 5 (3): 30-35
Dawkins, Casey J. 2003. Regional Development Theory: Conceptual foundations, classic works, and recent developments. Journal of Planning Literature 18 (2): 131-172.
Martin, Ron & Sunley, Peter. 2011. Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the life cycle model? Regional Studies 45 (10): 1299-1318
Solow, Robert M. 1994. Perspectives on Growth Theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 45-54
Asra, Abuzar. 2000. Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 5 (1-2): 91-111
Dartanto, Teguh & Nurkholis. 2013. The Determinants of Poverty Dynamics in Indonesia: evidence from panel data. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 49 (1): 6184
Mogstad, Magne, Langorgen, Audun & Aaberge, Rolf. 2007. Region-Specific versus Country-Specific Poverty Lines in Analysis of Poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality 5 (1): 115-122
Savitch, H.V. 2002. What Is New About Globalisation and What Does It Portend for Cities? International Social Science Journal 54: 179-189
Pain, Kathy. The Strategic Planning Protagonist: Unveiling the global mega-city region. dalam Knowles, Richard D. & Rozenblat, Celine. eds. 2016. Sir Peter Hall: Pioneer in Regional Planning, Transport, and Urban Geography. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice Vol. 52
Barca, Fabrizio, McCann, Philip & Rodriguez-Pose, Andres. 2012. The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134-152
Marcuse, Peter. 1985. Gentrification, Abandonment, and Displacement: Connections, causes and policy responses in New York City. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 28 (1): 195-240
Blankart, Charles B. & Koester, Gerrit B. Political Economics versus Public Choice: Two views of political economy in competition
Stark, Andrew. 2002. What Is the New Public Management? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (1): 137-151
McCann, Philip. Modern Urban and Regional Economics, 2 editions. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Regional Economics”]

Module name Regional Economics
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-EW
Subtitle, if applicable Ekonomi Wilayah
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2
Person responsible for the module Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D.
Lecturer Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D.
Prof. Ir. Bakti Setiawan, MA., Ph.D.
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 7.5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend basic theories of regional economics
Able to critique the conceptions of regional economics structure and its relation to development using spatial perspective
Able to formulate an economic/financing scheme to solve regional economics problems
Content This course provides knowledge and skills in spatial economics, specifically in regional economics. It will provide a spatial perspective in each economics analysis and examine how the process of interaction between environment spatial with economic activity

The subject topics are:

Basic economic theory (Macroeconomic and Microeconomics)
Poverty and regional disparity
Regional economics; labour, regional growth, multiplier effect
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm, economics paper and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Grant, Ruth W. 2015. Rethinking the Ethics of Incentives. Journal of Economic Methodology 22 (3): 354-372.
Parkin, Michael. 2016. Opportunity Cost: A reexamination. The Journal of Economic Education 47 (1): 12-22
Watts, Brad R. 2008.  Understanding Opportunity Cost and the Economist’s View. A response to “the Economist’s Fallacy.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluations 5. (10):89-92.
Gandjour, Afschim. 2008. Is It Rational to Pursue Utilitarianism? Ethica; Perspective Journal of the European Ethics Networks 14(2):139-158
Hotelling, Harold. 1929. Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal 39 (153): 41-57
McCann, Philip. 1993. The Logistics-Cost Location-Production Problem. Journal of Regional Science 33 (4): 503-516
Mulligan, Gordon F. 1984. Agglomeration and Central Place Theory: A review of the
literature. International Regional Science Review 9 (1): 1-42
Porter, Michael E. 1998. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review November-December: 77-90
Berry, Brian J.L. & Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam. 2011. The City Size Distribution Debate: Resolution for US urban regions and megalopolitan areas. Cities 29 (S1): S17-S23
Eaton, B. Curtis & Lipsey Richard G. 1982. An Economic Theory of Central Places. The Economic Journal 92 (365): 56-72
Giesen, Kristian & Sudekun, Jens. 2011. Zipf’s Law for Cities in the Regions and the Country. Journal of Economic Geography 11: 667-686
Kraus, Marvin. 2006. Monocentric Cities. Dalam Arnott, Richard J. & McMillen, Daniel P. eds. 2006. A Companion to Urban Economics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 96-108.
O’Kelly, Morton & Bryan, Deborah. 1996. Agricultural Location Theory: Von Thunen’s contribution to economic geography. Progress in Human Geography 20 (4): 457-475
Wagner, William B. 1974. An Empirical Test of Reilly’s Law of Retail Gravitation. Growth and Change 5 (3): 30-35
Dawkins, Casey J. 2003. Regional Development Theory: Conceptual foundations, classic works, and recent developments. Journal of Planning Literature 18 (2): 131-172.
Martin, Ron & Sunley, Peter. 2011. Conceptualizing Cluster Evolution: Beyond the life cycle model? Regional Studies 45 (10): 1299-1318
Solow, Robert M. 1994. Perspectives on Growth Theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 45-54
Asra, Abuzar. 2000. Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 5 (1-2): 91-111
Dartanto, Teguh & Nurkholis. 2013. The Determinants of Poverty Dynamics in Indonesia: evidence from panel data. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 49 (1): 6184
Mogstad, Magne, Langorgen, Audun & Aaberge, Rolf. 2007. Region-Specific versus Country-Specific Poverty Lines in Analysis of Poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality 5 (1): 115-122
Savitch, H.V. 2002. What Is New About Globalisation and What Does It Portend for Cities? International Social Science Journal 54: 179-189
Pain, Kathy. The Strategic Planning Protagonist: Unveiling the global mega-city region. dalam Knowles, Richard D. & Rozenblat, Celine. eds. 2016. Sir Peter Hall: Pioneer in Regional Planning, Transport, and Urban Geography. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice Vol. 52
Barca, Fabrizio, McCann, Philip & Rodriguez-Pose, Andres. 2012. The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134-152
Marcuse, Peter. 1985. Gentrification, Abandonment, and Displacement: Connections, causes and policy responses in New York City. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 28 (1): 195-240
Blankart, Charles B. & Koester, Gerrit B. Political Economics versus Public Choice: Two views of political economy in competition
Stark, Andrew. 2002. What Is the New Public Management? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (1): 137-151
McCann, Philip. Modern Urban and Regional Economics, 2 editions. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK

.[/restab][/restabs]

Statistics

Course Term 1 Tuesday, 13 August 2019

Module name Statistics
Modul level, if applicable –
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-105
Subtitle, if applicable Statistika
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc. Ph.D
Lecturer Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc. Ph.D
  Ratna Eka Suminar, ST., M.Sc
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course
Type of teaching, contract hours Lecture / TCL, CBL, SCL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to apply basic concepts and tools in statistics for planning research

 

Able to select the appropriate method of statistical analysis for certain urban and regional planning cases
Able to demonstrate statistical model in planning context
Content Students will be taught various methods for quantitative analysis that are commonly used in planning and scientific research. The topics learned in this subject are:
Course Introduction and Variables Understanding
Univariate-descriptive analysis
Distribution and Normal Curve Theory
Hypothesis Test (Mean and Proportion)
Bivariate Analysis
Multiple Regression Analysis
Multiple Discriminant Analysis
Factor Analysis dan cluster analysis
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination written mid-term and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list [1]   Sugiyono. 1999. Statistik untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta, Bandung.

[2]   Furqon. 2008. Statistika Terapan untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[3]   Sudjana. Metoda Statistika

Planning Studio 1

Course Term 1 Tuesday, 13 August 2019

[restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” responsive=”false”]
[restab title=”Urban Housing Planning and Development Policy” active=”active”]

Module name Studio 1 Urban Housing Planning and Development Policy
Module level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17–6-1-SP1
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Kebijakan Pengembangan Perumahan Kota
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Lecturer Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban housing planning and development and its various components
Able to evaluate existing urban housing planning implementation
Able to formulate issues in urban housing
Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of urban housing planning and development
Content The students will do a simulation regarding the policies in urban housing development planning. The topics discussed in this subject are:
Guide of Planning Studio
Resume of Regional/Urban and urban housing profile
problem formulation
Analysis of relation between problems
Objective formulation
Scenario development
Planning policies
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Sustainable Neighborhood Planning for the Region: Neighborhood Scale
Ford, Jonathan (2009). Grids, Patterns, & Sustainable Infrastructure : New Partners for Smart Growth
LaGro, J, 2008, Site Analysis: A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land Planning and Site Design
Payne, G & Majale, M. 2004. The Urban Housing Manual
Committee on Review of Geographic Information Systems Research and Applications, 2003, GIS for Housing and Urban Development
Hasselaar, E. 2006. Health Performance of Housing: Indicatiors and Tools
Jenkins, P, Smith H & Wang YP. 2007. Planning and Housing in the Rapidly Urbanising World
Pedoman Umum Rumah Sederhana Sehat
Silas, Johan (1989). Perjalanan Panjang Perumahan Indonesia, dalam dan sekitar abad XX

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Development”]

Module name Studio 1 Urban Development
Module level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-SK1
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Pengembangan Kota
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Lecturer Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Dr. Eng. Muhammad Sani Roychansyah, S.T., M.Eng.
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minumum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban planning and

development and its various components

Able to evaluate existing urban planning and development

implementation

Able to formulate issues in urban development
Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of urban planning and development
Content The students will do planning in an urban scale. The topics discussed in this subject are:
Profile, objectives, and problem formulation
Spatial structure and pattern identification
Project formulation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB
Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Regional Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 1 Regional Planning and Development
Module level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-SW1
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Pengembangan Wilayah
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Lecturer Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP, Ph.D
Ratna Eka Suminar, ST., M.Sc.
Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of regional planning and development and its various components
Able to evaluate existing regional planning and development implementation
Able to formulate issues of regional development
Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of regional planning and development
Content The students will do planning in a regional context. The topics discussed in this subject are:
Profile, objectives, and problem formulation
Spatial structure and pattern identification
Project formulation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Bendavid-Val, A. (1991). Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners. London: Preager
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB
Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban Heritage Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 1 Urban Heritage Planning and Development
Module level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-SH1
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 1: Perencanaan Pengembangan Kota Kaya Cagar Budaya
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Ir. Agam Marsoyo, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Lecturer Ir. Didik Kristiadi, MLA, M.Arch.UD
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban heritage planning and development and its various components
Able to evaluate existing urban heritage planning and development implementation
Able to formulate issues in urban heritage development
Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of urban heritage planning and development
Content The students will do planning from a heritage perspective. The topics discussed in this subject are:
Profile, objectives, and problem formulation
Spatial structure and pattern identification
Project formulation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis
Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB
Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small
Nuryanti, W. (2009). The Role of Heritage Tourism in Community Planning and Development. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Urban or Regional Infrastructure Planning and Development”]

Module name Studio 1 Urban or Regional Infrastructure Planning and Development
Module level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-SI1
Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 1: Studio Perencanaan & Pengelolaan Infrastruktur (Wilayah atau Kota)
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module  
Lecturer  
Language Indonesia
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / PBL, CBL, SCL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance.
Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minumum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of infrastructure planning and development and its various components in urban/regional context
Able to evaluate existing infrastructure planning and development implementation in urban/regional context
Able to formulate infrastructure issues in urban/regional context
Able to design plans/programs for the implementation of infrastructure planning and development in urban/regional context
Content The students will do an urban or regional infrastructure planning. The topics discussed in this subject are:
Profile, objectives, and problem formulation
Spatial structure and pattern identification
Project formulation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation
Media employed LCD, Computer
Reading list Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB
Harvard Business Essentials Managing Projects large and small

.[/restab]
[restab title=”Commercial Housing Planning and Development”] read more

Process and Planning Method & Technique 1

Course Term 1 Tuesday, 13 August 2019

Module name Planning Methods and Techniques 1
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-104
Subtitle, if applicable Metode dan Teknik Perencanaan 1
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Prof. Dr. Ir. Achmad Djunaedi, MUP
Lecturer Prof. Dr. Ir. Achmad Djunaedi, MUP
Prof. Dr. R. Rijanta, M.Sc.
Prof. Ir. Bakti Setiawan, MA., Ph.D.
Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
Ir. Didik Kristiadi, MLA, MAUD
Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
M. Sani Roychansyah, ST., M.Eng., D.Eng
Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D
Dr. Yori Herwangi, ST., MURP
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 3 SKS / 7.5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the process and planning cycle in various contexts and scales
Able to demonstrate various methods and techniques in planning contexts
Able to implement various techniques in planning cycle
Content This course teaches fundamental techniques for analyses  that are used in plan formulation process. This course is tightly related to the Planning Studio Course.

The subject topics are:

Planning Process
Physical Components Analysis
Population Analysis
Economic Performance Analysis
Link Between Components Analysis
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Written midterm and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Aziz, I.J. (1994). Ilmu Ekonomi Regional dan beberapa Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Bendavid-Val, A. (1991). Regional and Local Economic Analysis for Practitioners. London: Preager.
O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
Comprehensive Planning, Edward J. Sullivan, The Urban Lawyer, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Summer 2004), pp. 541-55 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/27895502?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents)
Adioetomo, Sri Moertaningsih. (2010). Dasar Dasar Demografi. Salemba Empat. Lembaga Demografi FE UI
Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation
Kim, LL Wiggins. Expert systems applications to urban planning
Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press.
Rogers, Andrei. Matrix methods in urban and regional analysis
Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems
Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin.
Warpani, Suwardjoko. (1984). Analisis Kota dan Daerah. Bandung: ITB
http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf

Spatial Theory

Course Term 1 Tuesday, 13 August 2019

Module name Spatial Theories
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP17-6-1-103
Subtitle, if applicable Teori Keruangan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
Lecturer Dr. Ir. Suryanto, MSP.
M. Sani Roychansyah, ST., M.Eng., D.Eng
Prof. Ir. Bambang Hari Wibisono, MUP, Ph.D
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, CBL, TBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to explain the concept of space and spatial planning in various scales
Able to synthesize the characteristics of urban/regional space within the forming entity, the affecting aspects, and the problems that arise within the scale (urban and regional)
Able to display the products, methods and the consequences of spatial planning intervention
Able to demonstrate grouping of space/place based on its typology and components
Content This course provides knowledge to the student about the spatial concept in the urban and regional context. The course begins with an introduction to space and spatial concept, and also its elements and factors that affect space including interactions between human and environment. Students are also given knowledge regarding the system for analysis and spatial synthesis, and the implementation of the spatial strategy, policy, management, and other cases in spatial planning. The subject class topics are:

  1. Introduction
  2. Spatial Concept and Definition
  3. Spatial Suitability
  4. Location Analysis
  5. Regional Development Theories
  6. Spatial Plan (Cases Example)
  7. Course Evaluation
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination written mid-term and final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Short, JR. An Introduction to Urban Geography. Routledge & Kegan Paul. London. 1984
Rustiadi E dkk. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. YOI. 2009
Jayadinata JT. Tata Guna Tanah dalam Perencanaan Pedesaan, Perkotaan, dan Wilayah. ITB. 1999
Doxiadis (1970), Ekistic. 1970
Richardson HW, Regional Economics; Location Theory, Urban Structure & Regional Change. Weidenfield & Nicolson. 1969
Richardson HW, Regional Economics; Location Theory, Urban Structure & Regional Change. Weidenfield & Nicolson. 1969 Bourne, LS & Simmons, JW, Systes of Cities, Oxford Univ. Press, 1978
DPU, 2008, UU 26/2007 tentang Penataan Ruang
Birch, E.L. (Ed.) (2008) The Urban and Regional Planning Reader, Routledge, New York
Doxiadis , K. A. (1968) Ekistics: An Introduction to the Science of Human Settlements, Oxford University Press, New York

Planning Theory

Course Term 1 Tuesday, 13 August 2019

Module name Planning Theory
Modul level, if applicable Master
Code, if applicable TKP 17-6-1-102
Subtitle, if applicable Teori Perencanaan
Courses, if applicable –
Semester(s) in which the module is taught 1
Person responsible for the module Prof. Ir. Sudaryono, Meng., Ph.D
Lecturer Prof. Ir. Sudaryono, Meng., Ph.D
Prof. Ir. Bakti Setiawan, MA., Ph.D.
Doddy Aditya Iskandar, ST., MCP., Ph.D
Language Indonesia, English
Relation to curriculum Compulsory Subject
Type of teaching, contract hours Lectures / SCL, PBL
Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 50 minutes of study activity in class.
Credit points 2 SKS / 5 ECTS
Requirements according to the examination regulations Minimum attendance is 75% of total classes
Recommended prerequisites –
Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to explain various planning genres and paradigms from planner figures
Able to critique the application of planning paradigm in group practice
Able to perform concept implementation, planning model & process, and planning practices in a socio-political context in Indonesia
Content This course provides knowledge of the history and genre of planning theories and the figure behind it. Students will be given in-depth knowledge regarding the theory of planning and theory in planning.

The subject topics are:

Planning History and Paradigm
Planning Theme: Post-modern planning, advocacy planning, rational planning and etc.
Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Weekly presentation and written final examination with open questions
Media employed LCD, computer
Reading list Friedmann, J., 1989. Planning in the public domain: discourse and praxis. Journal of planning education and research, 8(2), pp.128-130.
Campbell, S., & Fainstein, S. S. (Eds.). (1996). Readings in planning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mandelbaum, S., Mazza, L., Burchell, R.W.. (1996). Explorations in Planning Theory. The Center for Urban Policy Research
123

Recent Posts

  • MURP UGM Conducts Interview for Timor Leste Postgraduate Scholarship Applicants
  • MPWK UGM Students Conduct Field Survey in West Java to Support Urban and Regional Development Planning
  • Understanding Complexity of the Development in Various Context
  • Unpacking Indonesian Planning in Southern Planning Context
  • MURP Student Selected as YPP Participant for ISOCARP 2024
Universitas Gadjah Mada

Master in Urban and Regional Planning

Department of Architecture and Planning

Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Jl. Grafika No. 2, Sekip, Yogyakarta 55281

   mpwk@ugm.ac.id
   +62 (274) 580095; 580101
   +62 (274) 580052

PRANALA IT

  • Fasilitas Anda
  • Panduan IT UGM
  • Aktivasi Office
  • Microsoft Office 365

Pranala Akademik

  • SIMASTER
  • UNGGAH TESIS
  • WISUDA
  • PERPUSTAKAAN
  • CEK TURNITIN

© 2019 Master Program in Urban and Regional Planning

KEBIJAKAN PRIVASI/PRIVACY POLICY

[EN] We use cookies to help our viewer get the best experience on our website. -- [ID] Kami menggunakan cookie untuk membantu pengunjung kami mendapatkan pengalaman terbaik di situs web kami.I Agree / Saya Setuju