-
Module name Studio 2 Urban Housing Revitalization Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SP2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Peremajaan Permukiman Kota Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Lecturer Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban housing revitalization and its various components Able to formulate urban renewal investment plan and concept Able to design an urban revitalization project including its feasibility analysis Content The students will do planning specifically on the revitalization of urban housing. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press .
-
Module name Studio 2 Urban Neighborhood Planning and Development Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SK2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Perkotaan Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Lecturer Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of urban neighborhood planning and its various components Able to formulate urban neighborhood investment plan and concept Able to design an urban neighborhood project including its feasibility analysis Content The students will do planning regarding an urban neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press .
-
Module name Studio 2 Rural Neighborhood Planning and Development Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SW2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Perkotaan Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Lecturer Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of rural neighborhood planning and its various components Able to formulate rural neighborhood planning issues Able to design a long-term rural neighborhood plan/program Content The students will do planning regarding a rural neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems Dias, Hiran D. Manual for training in rural development planning Davidson, J. ; Wibberley, Gerald. Planning and the rural environment Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press .
-
Module name Studio 2 Heritage Neighborhood Planning and Development Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SH2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Penataan Kawasan Cagar Budaya Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Lecturer Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of heritage neighborhood planning and its various components Able to formulate heritage neighborhood investment plan and concept Able to design a heritage neighborhood plan/program that are integrated with the economic and community development Content The students will do planning in a heritage neighborhood area. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Nuryanti, W. (2009). The Role of Heritage Tourism in Community Planning and Development. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. http://www.bobwilliams.co.nz/ewExternalFiles/ssm.pdf Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press .
-
Module name Studio 2 Infrastructure Planning and Development Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SI2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Infrastruktur Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Lecturer Deva Foster Haroldas Swasto, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Retno Widodo, ST., M.Sc., Ph.D Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of infrastructure management and its various components Able to formulate infrastructure management issues Able to design an infrastructure management plan/project based on its sectors Content The students will do planning from an infrastructure perspective. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Erlewein L (eds). Methods and instruments for project planning and implementation Rodrigue, Jean Paul. The Geography of Transport Systems Berke, P. and Kaiser, E. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 2. O’Sullivan, A. (1996). Urban Economics. Chicago: Irwin. Djunaedi, Ahmad. 2012. Proses Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press .
-
Module name Studio 2 Property Planning and Development (Non-Residential) Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SR2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan Pengembangan Properti non-Perumahan Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Lecturer Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of non-residential property planning and its various components Able to formulate non-residential property investment plan and concept Able to design an non-residential property project including its feasibility analysis Content The students will do planning of non-residential property. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Webster, Chris. Property rights, planning and markets managing spontaneous cities Stevenson, Glenn G.. Common property economics a general theory and land use applications .
-
Module name Studio 2 Landscape Planning (Urban, or Rural) Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-SL2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Perencanaan Lansekap (Perkotaan atau Pedesaan) Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Lecturer Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of landscape planning and its various components Able to determine landscape potential in various context Able to create a sustainable landscape design/program Content The students will do a landscape planning of an urban or rural area. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Gonzalez, Alonso ; Eugenio, Martinez-Falero (eds). Quantitative techniques in landscape planning Steiner, Frederick. The living landscape : an ecological approach to landscape planning Bookout, Lloyd W. Value by design landscape, site planning and amenities Reid, Grant W. From concept to form in landscape design .
-
Module name Studio 2 Smart City Infrastructure Modul level, if applicable Master Code, if applicable TKP17-6-2-ST2 Subtitle, if applicable Studio Perencanaan 2: Infrastruktur Kota Cerdas Courses, if applicable – Semester(s) in which the module is taught 2 Person responsible for the module Lecturer Language Indonesia Relation to curriculum Compulsory Course Type of teaching, contract hours Practical / SCL, PBL, CBL Workload 1 work credit or SKS is equal to 100 minutes of practical study in the studio with lecturer’s guidance. Credit points 4 SKS / 11.2 ECTS Requirements according to the examination regulations Presentation/Display and Written final examination Recommended prerequisites Studio 1 Module objectives/intended learning outcomes Able to comprehend the principles of smart city infrastructure and its various components Able to formulate smart city infrastructure investment planning issues Able to design a smart city infrastructure plan/program that are integrated with the economic and community development Content The students will do planning and incorporating the smart city infrastructure. The topics in this subject are: Strategic Program Analysis Spatial and Physical Design Economic, Commercial, or Financial Analysis Institutional Design for Program Implementation Study and examination requirements and forms of examination Progress and final display presentation Media employed LCD, Computer Reading list Nancholas, S. 1998.How to (or not to do)… A Logical Framework. Health Policy and Planning,13 (2), 189-193.Project Cycle Management’, The Courier,Jan/Feb 1999, 173, 75-77. Brussels: European Commission Akroyd, D. 1995.Steps toward the adoption of Logical Framework Approach in the African Development Bank: some illustrations for agricultural sector projects. Project Appraisal, 10 (1), 19-30. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02688867.1995.9726970) Caputo, Andrea. (2013). Systemic Stakeholders’ Management for Real Estate Development Projects. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal. 5. 66-82. Steurer, R. (2006): Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From a ‘Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15/1, 55-69; ISSN 0964-4733 Keating, B. (2017). Basic Cost-Benefit Analysis for Assessing Local Public Projects. Business Expert Press. Layard, P. (1999). Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Savas, E. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House. Bongenaar, A. (2001). Corporate governance and public private partnership. Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. (2007). Public private partnerships. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Bouskela et al., 2016, The Road toward Smart Cities: Migrating from Traditional City Management to the Smart City, IDB. Dameri, R.P. & A. Cocchia. (2013) Smart City and Digital City: Twenty Years of Terminology Evolution. The Proceeding of itAIS 2013 Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS: Empowering society through digital innovations, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan (Italy), December 14th, 2013 Nam, Taewoo & Theresa A. Pardo. (2011) Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, June 12-15, 2011, College Park, MD, USA Marcin Baron, 2012, “Do We Need Smart Cities for Resilience”, Journal of Economics and Management, Vol. 10, University of Economics, Katowice. .